Well, I really think it's not the Game what is non sense, but I'm sure every player has his own way of understanding Game Rules and Mechanics and you will get nothing trying to change the others view, so I have no intention of joining the discussion. Anyway, I'm happy seeing so many people writing and answering almost every day in the Forum.

But there's a thing I agree and want to comment. As Alconan has said, there's really no diplomacy in the Game. That's probably the main reason why alliances never change, so perhaps if everybody makes a try and get involved in diplomatic affairs, perhaps we will have a more varied and dynamic Game.

I really respect your play style, even without getting diplomatically involved. I'm not saying I would not like that you play our way and answer diplomatic messages and offers, but I respect your decision. However, perhaps if we all begin signing non-agression pacts, alliances, peace treaties, trade treaties, and others, there will be new issues to fight for, to change friendships and alliances, to break pacts and diversify Game events.

That said, I move away and you can continue discussing your different ways of understanding the Game.