QUOTE:
maybe Ronin my friend has an Idea (-:
we know us well

However.. i don´t think he would care about that.. he just said that he would at least hear what the bertayed would have to say if they want to build a bridge between the two roman republics..

Well.. nice to read that somebody thinks i am his friend..
RoRo.. you took over my char here but i would be glad if you would not make comments or something like that in my name.. Well.. to the outcast Romans.. the german Roman Republic was indeed thinking of to make an link offer to the english Roman Republic. But actually i see no mentionable roman counterpart here.

Nope, that part got kicked out, we are kinda a Senate in exile...
But this remains funny and very annoying, We (the Senate) know what we want and are willing to do what it takes to achieve it but apparently we can't.....
Ah well, people with plates before their heads are annoying...

Ralen wrote:

QUOTE:
Nope, that part got kicked out, we are kinda a Senate in exile...
But this remains funny and very annoying, We (the Senate) know what we want and are willing to do what it takes to achieve it but apparently we can't and can't do anything about that either.....
Ah well, people with plates before their heads are annoying...

I see

"Done bickering now? I did some research, and found out it is legal what happened...

Look at it this way...
When you walk up to an empty castle there is a button to claim the throne....

When an army successfully removes a kingdoms every shire and sacks a castle... the castle becomes available to the first who claims the castle...

When a ruler is voted out the throne becomes available to the first to claim the castle...

Upon completing a voting process to remove a ruler. It appears those who wished things handled properly should have had someone ready to immediately claim the throne...

I wondered about this in KH and began to question. How come rulers can resign, and specific people were able to take up the throne. Specifically dealing with KH England. There are other rulers who have handled it the same way.

I am told this is how this works. Which means simply Rome was by game coding taken legally. The lady just had a faster draw gentlemen. Does it yikers that she kicked all who would have voted her out? Yep! This isn't illegal either.

As legal ruler now by the quickest draw theory of Rome. She had legal rights to remove any troubling people from her kingdom. Does this stop the outed from seeking revenge? Nope but if you should succeed in removing the castle from her grip. Remember to be quicker at claiming that throne!"

Rome was a republic. We VOTED for our leaders. Ildico destroyed that and she will pay for it, one way or the other. Stay out of our business, gaul!

"I was obviously speaking of game coding, not rp. Perhaps you did vote in rp, but for codes this is legal. I think someone needs to hang from my chains." "FyI I was asked to research, and speak on this topic. By one of your evicted players. Originating post was to admin which is also not rp. Play nice now Barbarian."

Relax... None of us, exiled romans, think what lldico did was against the game rules and, if anyone thinks so, is surely wrong. Under the game rules, with the throne vacant, any member of a tribe can take the lead.

In what we are all agree is that, once a warrior becomes part of a tribe, he accepts the rules of coexistence that exist there. In the case of Rome, those rules means accepting that leaders were chosen by voting between the roman citizens, not taking power by surprise while others debated and waited for the election.

And also, probably this state of affairs would have been avoided if the first message of the new ruler wouldn't have been "Hail Empress Ildico", without consulting any member of the roman Senate and showing she would be the only in power.

In any case, we are now negotiating. We'll see what future brings for us...

"Sadly I was approached as the mechanics wasn't understood. They believed it was game cheating. By theory you would be correct. As leader of the Gauls I would hope my warriors would not do such, but that is why the coding is there. To allow for this option. There is never a guarantee that in RP the hope would be the consensus. Through out all countries origin is this level of deceit. Doesn't make it any more correct, but then again if negotiations are in the works this is wonderful news as well. Since I did what was asked of me. I will disperse to other tasks, but hope all on both sides remember in speaking of admin or mechanics this is an ooc topic."