Eddard wrote:
QUOTE:
If is a knight of the opinion that he can claim the approval of the Tribe for himself in a direct choice, he has on "My Tribe" side the possibility to challenge his King to a choice. Then the other warriors have 7-days time to choose one of the both.
Independent of the exit of the choice a 30-days barrier exists in the connection for outvoting attempts.
Kings and chancellors see the option not under "My Tribe".
The present outvoting function continues alternatively.
This seems to me a very good solution for a subject we use to debate in extend on the other servers, but excluding the Chancellors it doesn't seems right to me.
It's the Challenger vs. the King, Chancellors are players, part of the nation the destiny is decided and have the right to be part of the decision process.
If you're gonna tell me that the King controls (some of) them, he can always demote them for a day to cast the vote and appoint them back.
Do not throw the arrow which will return against you!